🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.